Research

Entertainment & games AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only place a site in an industry where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers Entertainment & games sites we could read and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 11:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

See the Entertainment & games leaderboard

How Entertainment & games sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

Not enough sites yet There are not enough sites yet to split them by score.

An industry is only known for a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Entertainment & games sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 17%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 4%
Show as a table
How Entertainment & games sites treat AI crawlers
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers17%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers4%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Entertainment & games sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Structured data is present” (56%, against 45% of all sites); “Links don't point at redirects” (94%, against 85% of all sites); “Title fits a search snippet” (51%, against 42% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Entertainment & games site we could read passed.

Every check, Entertainment & games against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Entertainment & games sites against all sites: share passing each check
Check Entertainment & games sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 95% 88% +7 points
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 9% 15% −6 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 85% 90% −5 points
security.txt is published 1% 6% −5 points
Reached without a redirect chain 100% 98% +2 points
Caching or validation headers are set 91% 92% −1 point
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 89% 86% +3 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 87% 79% +8 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 61% 64% −3 points
Mobile viewport is set 87% 85% +2 points
Has a title tag 100% 99% +1 point
Title fits a search snippet 51% 42% +9 points
Has a meta description 88% 82% +6 points
Description fits a search snippet 58% 55% +3 points
The page has an H1 61% 63% −2 points
Logical heading order 67% 60% +7 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 44% 47% −3 points
Images have descriptive alt text 83% 82% +1 point
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 99% 97% +2 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 53% 48% +5 points
Twitter/X card tags 69% 62% +7 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 64% 60% +4 points
Missing pages return a real 404 84% 85% −1 point
Images are optimised 20% 22% −2 points
Language and charset declared 96% 94% +2 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 64% 61% +3 points
Search Console / Bing verification 69% 68% +1 point
A favicon is set 96% 89% +7 points
No meta-refresh redirect 100% 99% +1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 88% 89% −1 point
Your answer is in the HTML 83% 86% −3 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 57% 50% +7 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 49% 53% −4 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 77% 78% −1 point
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 45% 51% −6 points
Section headings are phrased as questions 18% 22% −4 points
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 88% 84% +4 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% 100% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 54% 57% −3 points
The links in llms.txt resolve — 93% —
Author / publisher is clear 45% 38% +7 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 17% 13% +4 points
llms.txt is present and valid 9% 15% −6 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 3% 9% −6 points
Structured data is present 56% 45% +11 points
Structured data is valid 98% 97% +1 point
FAQ / Q&A schema — 36% —
Organization schema with sameAs 15% 16% −1 point
Right schema type for the page 72% 69% +3 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 53% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 13% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 80% 83% −3 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 96% 94% +2 points
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 21% 19% +2 points
Content usage preferences declared 7% 5% +2 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 2% −2 points
No broken links 96% 89% +7 points
Links don't point at redirects 94% 85% +9 points
Descriptive anchor text 100% >99% Level
Sensible internal/external link mix 91% 88% +3 points
Links are real links 84% 81% +3 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% 1% −1 point
WebMCP tools in the page 0% 2% −2 points
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 0% 1% −1 point
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 0% 4% −4 points
OAuth protected-resource metadata 0% 4% −4 points
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 4% −4 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — — —
Auth.md agent registration 0% 1% −1 point
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call